Is there a developers image of 16.04 LTS? We don't care if you insert null values into columns that allow for nulls - regardless of the existence of a constraint. Abbreviated output from sp_helpconstraint titleauthor after attempting to disable a foreign key. Anyone considering using the services of an Oracle support expert should independently investigate their credentials and experience, and not rely on advertisements and self-proclaimed expertise. have a peek here
DISABLE. But a unique index has a side effect - of - making things unique. Since a unique constraint can't be disabled, having the status of a constraint doesn't give the unique constraint any additional behavior beyond a unique index. There are two indexes on different tables for which is happens. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7521817/oracle-unique-constraint-and-unique-index-question
If I try to drop them, it says 'Cannot drop constraint - nonexistent constraint'. –ICR Apr 2 '14 at 15:16 1 This might be a stupid question, but did you ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> insert into t values(timestamp'2009-01-01 01:00:00+01:00'); insert into t values(timestamp'2009-01-01 01:00:00+01:00') * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00001: unique constraint (OPS$TKYTE.T_UNIQUE) violated In 11g, you can do this: ops$tkyte%ORA11GR1> create table t Nope, doesn't look like it to me - does it look like it to you? We have debate in our company about Primary Key on top of Unique Index and Primary Key on top of Normal Index.
What am I missing? Security Vulnerability Updates About CUBRID Dev Release History Release Policy Contact Downloads CUBRID Engine CUBRID Tools CUBRID Manager CUBRID Web Manager CUBRID Query Browser CUBRID Migration Toolkit CUBRID Windows Downloader CUBRID I have an Oracle 10g database. Ora 00001 Unique Constraint Violated Index I wanted to implement unique constraint on a set of columns (7 to be precise).
So we've made an important discovery here: The index creation options other than FILLFACTOR that are available for a unique index are not available for a unique constraint. Ora-00001 Unique Constraint (constraint_name) Violated Let's assume the table is named "foo". Followup April 19, 2010 - 8:17 am UTC sometimes people create indexes using create index (instead of using index in the constraint) to get it "just so". To identify the table and find out all the relevant information about the index it is normally easiest to use Oracle Schema Manager - the name of the constraint given in
not true. http://www.cryer.co.uk/brian/oracle/ORA00001.htm Alternately, to identify the name of the table use: select table_name from all_indexes where index_name='
well, you get the idea .. :\ I checked some of the syntax for these, but I'm not seeing it ... (probably can't see it for looking at it). navigate here April 16, 2010 - 3:09 pm UTC Reviewer: Chuck Jolley from OKC, OK USA You never use surrogate keys? Oracle technology is changing and we strive to update our BC Oracle support information. ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> alter table t disable constraint i_didnt_create_this; Table altered. Java.sql.sqlintegrityconstraintviolationexception: Ora-00001: Unique Constraint Violated
In fact you have to specify KEEP INDEX while dropping unique constraint to keep index. Unique constraint/index standard? I've seen some mention that declaring a unique constraint gives the optimizer more information than a unique index... Check This Out You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second.
using CUBRID Tutorials CUBRID Tutorials Wiki Release Notes Video Trainings Manuals 10.0 English Manual 9.3 English Manual 9.3 Korean Manual 2008 R4.4 English Manual 2008 R4.4 Korean Manual All CUBRID Manual Unique Constraint Violated During Update The answer to that question, it turns out, takes a big of digging. Enable Wireless on Fresh Debian Build fraction line in French Does the reciprocal of a probability represent anything?
Modify functions in R using body, formals and environment methods How to apply for UK visit visa after four refusal Encode the alphabet cipher What does this ice key do? Alternatively, you can define UNIQUE integrity constraints on the desired columns. April 02, 2006 - 2:53 pm UTC Reviewer: reader Hello Tom, While reading the topic I got confuse about PRIMARY KEY!! Ora-00001 Unique Constraint (sys.i_job_job) Violated The problem is: insert into t values(timestamp'2009-01-01 00:00:00+00:00'); insert into t values(timestamp'2009-01-01 01:00:00+01:00'); are the same, but they are not the same.
ops$tkyte%ORA10GR2> insert into t values(timestamp'2009-01-01 00:00:00+00:00'); 1 row created. Command :1 CREATE INDEX stsc.xindex01 ON scott.temp (x) NOLOGGING TABLESPACE POINDEX PARALLEL (DEGREE 32); Command :2 CREATE UNIQUE INDEX stsc.xindex02 ON scott.temp ( a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h ) NOLOGGING TABLESPACE POINDEX PARALLEL (DEGREE 32); If I wanted to create a table that supported logical deletes but ensure that COL1 is unique for all non-deleted rows SQL> ed Wrote file afiedt.buf 1 CREATE TABLE t ( this contact form Their details are: CREATED 14-JAN-14 20.14.11 LAST_DDL_TIME 14-JAN-14 20.14.11 OWNER MEDDBA INDEX_NAME STATUS_REQUEST INDEX_TYPE NORMAL TABLE_OWNER MEDDBA TABLE_NAME STATUS TABLE_TYPE TABLE UNIQUENESS NONUNIQUE COMPRESSION DISABLED PREFIX_LENGTH TABLESPACE_NAME MEDTBS INI_TRANS 2 MAX_TRANS
It'll raise the same ora-00001. What is way to eat rice with hands in front of westerners such that it doesn't appear to be yucky? Regards HJR > Greetings, > Michael > Received on Tue Nov 16 2004 - 14:06:24 CST This message: [ Message body ] Next message: Jim Cheng: "Re: Install both Oracle 8i I dont understand where the issue is..
just and that was what i wanted > to say .. Upon truncating MTL_REVISIONS_INTERFACE will take care of ORA-00001 by using the instructions below: Create table backup_
unique constraint\index - continued April 02, 2006 - 12:05 pm UTC Reviewer: Shai Itzkovitch from Israel My previous comment assumes, there are currently no indexes defined on any combination of the