Home > Unique Constraint > Unique Constraint Error Merge Statement Oracle

Unique Constraint Error Merge Statement Oracle


Now let's repeat this exercise using an ID value for a row that does not exist in the table: MERGE INTO merge_test dest USING (SELECT 20 AS id , 20 AS Thanks for the explanation and your quick responses are appreciated. Not the answer you're looking for? Login. have a peek here

Oracle then blocks session 2 as it detects a uniqueness conflict with the row that session 1 is inserting. Many thanks! They clearly say: your SQL statement never fails unless constraints are violated at the end of the transaction execution.. What is wrong?

Oracle Merge Distinct

HTH Regards Raj Report message to a moderator Re: MERGE statement and primary key constraint violation [message #301715 is a reply to message #301711] Thu, 21 February 2008 If an unique index is equivalent to nondeferrable unique constraint, then OK, but that doesn’t seem to always be the case: foreign keys can only be created on unique constraints, not SQL> SQL> insert into stab values (1,'New name of Ram',501); <----- Name value is more than 10 char ******* 1 row created. Regards Michel Report message to a moderator Re: MERGE statement and primary key constraint violation [message #301724 is a reply to message #301711] Thu, 21 February 2008 08:07

The answer that you gave very clearly answered all of my questions. The solution to this problem is to simply remove the MERGE and replace it with an INSERT/UPDATE combination: BEGIN INSERT INTO merge_test (id, val) VALUES (20, 20); EXCEPTION WHEN DUP_VAL_ON_INDEX THEN This is a very powerful feature in Oracle and there arehundereds of articles on-line about this. select count(field1) from source_table; select count(distinct field1) from source_table; Regards Raj P.S : As @Michael rightly pointed out why distinct if field1 is unique. [Updated on: Thu, 21 February 2008 08:11]Report

That is, given the same set of input data - we could come up with different "answers" depending on how the rows were accidentally processed. TABLE: ORDER_LOCK Name Null Type ---------------------- -------- ---------- ORDER_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(10) [PRIMARY KEY] ORDER_REF_ID NUMBER(10) [UNIQUE KEY] ORDER_MSG_SENT NUMBER(1) merge into ORDER_LOCK al using ( select ? Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. (LogOut/Change) You are http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27398276/merge-statement-unique-index-constraint-validation-per-row-or-per-statement Curious given the code had been running in production for 6 months… The line number for the PL/SQL package that had thrown the exception showed that it came from a MERGE

more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Get 1:1 Help Now Advertise Here Enjoyed your answer? Many users experience ORA-00001. Simple description of Consistent Read is When a (reading) query starts, it is important that the values of the rows selected are the same as when the query started, even if

  1. Regards Wolfgang and we said...
  2. sql> CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER t_trg 2 AFTER INSERT 3 ON t 4 DECLARE 5 my_exception EXCEPTION; 6 BEGIN 7 NULL; 8 RAISE my_exception; 9 EXCEPTION 10 WHEN my_exception 11 THEN
  3. In the post I used a MERGE of just a single row so that would work well.
  4. ORDER_MSG_SENT from dual ) t on (al.ORDER_REF_ID = t.ORDER_REF_ID) when not matched then insert (ORDER_ID, ORDER_REF_ID, ORDER_MSG_SENT) values (ORDER_LOCK_SEQ.nextval, t.ORDER_REF_ID, t.ORDER_MSG_SENT) I am using the above Merge from my applications (Java).

Oracle Merge Statement

This is explained with examples here: Database Concepts - 5. https://markhoxey.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/ora-00001-unique-key-violated-with-merge/ ORA_ERR_NUMBER$ --------------- ORA_ERR_MESG$ ---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- R# ---------- 2290 ORA-02290: check constraint (CIDWWRITE.ORA-00001) violated 2 2290 ORA-02290: check constraint (CIDWWRITE.ORA-00001) violated 3 2290 ORA-02290: check constraint (CIDWWRITE.ORA-00001) violated 4 2290 ORA-02290: check Oracle Merge Distinct Ask Tom Sign In QuestionsArchivesPopularHotResourcesAbout QuestionsMERGE/UPDATE LOG ERRORS and Unique Constraints Breadcrumb Question and Answer Thanks for the question, Wolfgang. Ora 00001 Unique Constraint Violated While Inserting Here, it is explained that using a trigger method might help avoid ORA-00001 in that it does not allow duplicate primary keys.

Suppose, Session1 found that A and D fit the session's criteria, so it forms the edge A-D. navigate here Why cast an A-lister for Groot? Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. %d bloggers like this: The Systems People Inc. cmis_client_revenue_tmp ----------------------------------- client_id,client_name,month,year,revenue 100, 'ABCD', 1/31/2007 10000 100,' 'ABCD', 1/31/2007 5000 In my actual table it should be like this 100 'ABCD' 1/31/2007 15000 If you need any more details,i can

sql>> INSERT INTO t 2 SELECT ROWNUM, 'Test DML' 3 FROM DUAL 4 CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 10 5 LOG ERRORS INTO err$_t REJECT LIMIT UNLIMITED; 10 rows created. SQL> INSERT INTO t 2 SELECT ROWNUM, 'Test DML' 3 FROM DUAL 4 CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 10; 10 rows created. But, I still don't understand why same row is getting inserted twice when XYZ NEWS don't exist in movies table. 0 LVL 9 Overall: Level 9 Oracle Database 9 Message Check This Out Someone decides they need to have a record with ID = 10, and so they insert using insert into table (id) values (10).

Report message to a moderator Re: MERGE statement and primary key constraint violation [message #301739 is a reply to message #301738] Thu, 21 February 2008 08:40 Michel Cadot If two topological spaces have the same topological properties, are they homeomorphic? Regards Mark Reply ↓ stewashton on July 26, 2016 at 8:52 pm said: Why not just handle the exception after the MERGE statement?

AWS EC2 SSH from my IP address which has changed SXA Page Design vs Page Standard Values vs Page Branch Template Watching order for the Dan Brown films?

Join Now For immediate help use Live now! SQL>select * from movies; MOVIE_NAME SHOWTIME ------------------------------ ----------- GONE WITH THE WIND 8:00 PM ABC Indexes are maintained during execution and for unique indexes the rowid is not considered "part of the key". This statement is a convenient way to combine multiple operations.

It is a production environment, so I can not remove the clause indefinitely. –davor Mar 18 '15 at 12:26 The first ACID property of a transaction is Atomicity. Report message to a moderator Re: MERGE statement and primary key constraint violation [message #301714 is a reply to message #301711] Thu, 21 February 2008 07:53 S.Rajaram Messages: See my ignore_row_on_dupkey_index tips. this contact form If you find an error or have a suggestion for improving our content, we would appreciate your feedback.

CASE #2: ERROR at line 1: ORA-00001: unique constraint (scott.SYS_C001718695) violated CASE #3: 1 row created.